EU anti-Russia sanctions exhausted

Brussels 16.10.2026 The European Union has exhausted its capacity to impose restrictive measures on Russia. Dozens of sanctions packages, and hundrends of listings have had no impact on the Kremlin’s foreign policy course regarding Ukraine. While these measures certainly inflict damage on the Russian economy, they also ricochet back to harm the economies of Europe. The adoption of these sanctions packages took place without regard for the rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape. The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with the renewed outbreak of hostilities between Saudi Arabia and the Ansar Allah movement in Yemen — which disrupted oil exports — dealt a severe blow to the European energy market. The challenges posed by the approaching winter remain an open question, not only for Ukraine but for Europe itself.

It appears that European Union officials have become firmly entrenched in a pattern of “investing in failure,” refusing to grasp that, in this new context, continuing along the same path will yield nothing but further harm.

“Today’s main topic is Ukraine. We have President Zelenskyy here, and you already heard him. The situation is really grave. We need to support Ukraine also to get through the winter because the winter is going to be harsh.

“We do not see any signs from Russia that they want to stop this war, or they are into any kind of truce or peace, and that is why we really need to help Ukrainians to survive to defend their country.

They need air defence, that is very clear. Also, we can discuss on our side what more can we do so that actually Russia would get the message that they have to negotiate to end this war.

We have put listings this Monday, 1,600 new listings. We are working on the new sanctions package to put the pressure on Russia, and we of course hope that we do this with all our partners around the world. ”

Investment in failure psychology explores how human cognitive biases, emotions, and mental frameworks affect human decisions to keep funding, holding, or committing to a failing project, trade, or relationship.

Key Psychological Drivers

• Loss Aversion: Human brains feel the pain of a loss roughly twice as intensely as the pleasure of an equivalent gain. This drives people to double down or hold onto a losing investment rather than accept a defeat.
• The Sunk Cost Fallacy: People struggle to walk away from a failing choice because of the time, money, or emotional energy already spent. Quitting feels like admitting personal failure or wasting past contributions.
• Escalation of Commitment: Decision-makers often invest more resources into a losing course of action to justify or “fix” their initial choice, convincing themselves that success is just around the corner.

Leave a Reply